This seems like an "easy" win for getting more eyes on the FEPs. @silverpill what do you think?
@liaizon I think this is a good idea, and there were talks about it in the past, but so far no one volunteered to build the site.
Recently we added a machine-readable index to the FEP repo, it might make the task a little easier: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/index.json
It doesn't include summaries, but I can add them
@silverpill ah wow yeah def would make it easier. Maybe I take a shot at designing up a simple landing/directory page for this
@michal yes those are the feps. I was talking about having an intro page for them thats intentionally designed not just a raw repo
@michal I am very aware of the current fep repository, been around this process since it started. having documentation that is formatted and presented in a clean and concise way is really important. Not all fedi developers are the same type of repo first developers. There are features in the FEPs that designers and front end people need to understand and also just people who are interested in the fediverse in general.
@liaizon what is an "FEP"?
@palomakop Fediverse Enhancement Proposals